Katz v. United States
Legal Citation: 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Petitioner
Charles Katz
Respondent
United States
Petitioner's Claim
That evidence obtained by a wiretap on a public phone violated the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable search and seizure and should have been ruled inadmissible.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioner
Harvey A. Schneider and Burton Marks
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
John S. Martin, Jr.
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, John Marshall Harlan II, Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Earl Warren, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Hugo Lafayette Black
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
17 October 1967
Decision
Placing a wiretap on a public phone violates the Fourth Amendment.
[The entire page is 1311 words long]
